Features

consumption saving^$The amount of energy consumption which the straight centrifugal grinder's blower consuming is only 6% of mill, but Raymond Pulverize is 81%. In addition, the consumed energy when the spiller slides the stone occupies 25% of the whole energy, but straight centrifugal grinder does not exist.^#High efficience ^$In same condition, the grinding roller of straight centrifugal grinder can be through an area 2.3 times larger than Raymond Pulverize . ^#High using rate^$Grinding roller and grinding ring of Raymond Pulverizer are sunken in middle parts, so the metal amount that discarded is only 35% of original weight, but materiel in straight centrifugal grinder fall from top to bottom, so the metal amount can reach high to 55%. ^#Accident insurance ^$If bolt or iron ore falls into the Raymond Pulverize, this will conduce to breaking shovel and roller suspender transmutation. But straight centrifugal grinder will not appear such condition. ^#Occupation of area is small ^$It does not need to allocate whirlwind separator and a lot of pipelines .etc, so the occupation of land space is small.^#